Prohibited hyperlink to Britt Dekker - Internet and copyrights

Britt Dekker, a Dutch celebrity, was photographed by Playboy in 2011 for their Christmas Special. Two weeks later website GeenStijl received an anonymous tip (using an alias) that the pictures can be seen on the internet. A day later GeenStijl publishes a link to Britt Dekker’s photograph. Sanoma, the publisher that works for Playboy, immediately send a cease and desist letter to GeenStijl. GeenStijl does not respond to this, but because of all the media attention this generated the photos are now all over the internet.

In the court case that follows everything centers around the question whether or not placing a hyperlink to secret information on the internet is an infringement (a non-admissible form of publication). The court states that the internet is a free, open and readily accessible communication network. Whoever publishes something first on the internet (in a way that is accessible), publishes according to the Copyright Act. Placing a hyperlink can therefore be seen as a footnote in a book, referring to works that have already been published. Because the photos have been put on the internet by a third party, the third party is infringing and not GeenStijl.

GeenStijl, however, is not without fault, because they knew that the prior publication of the photos was illegal. Someone under an alias had sent the link, and Sanoma pointed this out to GeenStijl. Without the messages and links of GeenStijl, the consumer would not have been able to find the photos. Placing hyperlinks and messages is therefore in this case illegal. Invoking a claim on freedom of speech does not provide an answer for GeenStijl. The hyperlink was used solely to satisfy the curiosity of consumers and not to discuss any opinion. Hyperlinks themselves are not the problem, but depending on the context their use may be.

portrait rights



Latest news
Comparing apples to pears/ oranges - coat tail riding well known mark
VidaGra Stimulating or sickening? Coat-tail riding on well-known trademark
Witte wieven are witches - conceptual similar trademarks
Refusal Mindfuck - trademark conflictive with the public order and morals.
Ikea lamp not derived from Proplamp - knowledge and unfair competition
claimant
defendant
claimant
defendant

PURE - MENTOS

MENTOS has been selling chewing gum under the name MENTOS PURE FRESH for several years. In order to protect her rights MENTOS has registered the following trademarks: the logo MENTOS PURE FRESH, the logo MENTOS PURE FRESH 3 and a figurative depiction of the word PURE. Defendant sells chewing gum under the trademark DENTYNE PURE and has registered its logo as a trademark. Infringement or not?
Follow Abcor