FAQ

Protection of an idea

Many people think that they obtain copyright protection for an idea by putting it in writing and submitting this to an online register like CCproof. Unfortunately, that is often not the case.An idea must have materialized for something to become 'a work'. If the work is also an intellectual creation, it may be copyrighted. An online “registration” of the idea can never be more than a piece of evidence.

Claimant submitted his idea, being 'clothing with real money (banknotes) stitched onto it' with CC Proof. He submits a drawing of a cap with a banknote on it together with the tagline: “Money rules the world”. When defendant organizes a raffle where a T-shirt can be won with a five-hundred Euro bill stitched onto it, claimant argues that this constitutes an infringement of his copyright, based on the drawing registered with CC Proof.

Court deals with this quickly. A mere idea cannot be protected and the submitted drawing has not materialized sufficiently. That does not constitute a copyrighted work. The claim is rejected.

Latest news
The Oscars: A vibrant trademark
Abcor ranking IP STARS
Abcor ranked again in WTR1000
CAT versus FLOWERCAT
Issues of (semi) descriptive trademarks

Our Clients

Henny Rietkerk
Compra BV- domainnames, apps and website design

"Abcor has a great team of professionals. With an understanding of business and marketing."

Melanie Bauer
Mecy 2 bv - Gangster energy drinks

"The cooperation with Abcor is great. The attorneys can easily be contacted by telephone and/or email. Gangster energy 😄"

Martin de Waal
AIRMADE air solutions- aircondition and climat control apparatus

"Abcor thinks along with the client and provides professional advice. A very pleasant collaboration!"

Alex Duindam
Piet Vijverberg Nursery - nursery specialisted in Phalaenopsis and Dracaena

"Our long-standing partner with regards to trademarks is Abcor. We grow plants and they always grow and bloom. Star Quality by 5 is our brand for our 5 star quality. This brand and our quality is what distinguishes us from other nurseries."

Loes Vrij
Fashion designer

"Involvement, punctuality and an eye for the client"

Enzo Knol
Knol Power - vlogger- influencer

"What I like about Abcor is that they are pro-active. They have made a proposal for me how to anticipate on coat-tail riding, the situation that other parties will abuses my name and Knolpower brand. I appreciate their out-of the box approach."

Warmako

"platform for pet brands a.o. CleoCat, Dogr, District70, Geen Fields Rebel Petz"

Mark Uittenbogaart
Mark your Business - advertising agency

"We experience the cooperation with ABCOR as very pleasant. Honest advice, thinking along with you and keeping you sharp to protect your brand. Critical if necessary, realistic but always looking for a solution. We intend to keep working together for "

Christa Wouda
Dio Academy

"The Dio Academy started a co-operation with of ABCOR. As a sustainable transition adviser, she helps in reducing carbon footprint and total cost through innovation and makes people and organisations agile. Chain collaboration is the only route: it em"

ABCHronicle

Abcors ABChronicle no 46

Read this issue online »

Subscribe to newsletter »

Follow Abcor

IP Quiz

claimant

defendant

IP quiz Trademarks

Puma is one of the bigger sports and lifestyle brands in the world. The core-business is the design, development and sale of (sports) shoes, (sports) clothing and accessories. In 1960, Puma registered an international trademark for a device designed in 1958: the formstrip. Since then, Puma has registered approximately 90 formstrip trademarks with validity in the Benelux or the European Union. Puma claims that this is a serial mark. Monshoe is a wholesaler of women's shoes and related products. The company designs and develops Monshoe shoes which it largely markets itself. Monshoe sells its women's shoes under the brands Shoecolate and Pearlz. The shoe Shoecolate is offered in various colour combinations. Puma claims that Monshoe infringes its well-known formstrip trademark. Monshoe contradicts this and states that the average consumer will not perceive the device of Monshoe on the sneakers as a trademark. And if the public will recognize a trademark in the decoration, it will not make the connection to Puma. According to Monshoe, the formstrip logo is not a well-known trademark within the meaning of the BVIE and the UMVo. There is no likelihood of confusion because the sign does not or hardly evoke any association with Puma among the public. In light of the above, who is right? Does this constitute decorative use or linking to a well-known trademark?

Play the quiz

Trademark agency Abcor - protect your trademark

Contact