Abcor ranked in WTR1000

Trademark agencies are ranked annually based on independent assessments by clients, carried out by several different organizations. These rankings are of great importance, as it gives a firm recognition of their services and provides insight in the client’s satisfactory. The leading ranking institution in this respect, is the WTR 1000. The WTR 1000 lists the leading companies in the field of trademark law per country. We are proud to announce that this year, Abcor is once again recommended in the WTR1000 for the Benelux.

 

The list is established based on feedback from our global clients, agents, foreign trademark offices as well as law firms, and other business associates.

In addition to the commendation of our firm, individual recommendations were awarded to our trademark attorneys Mirjam de Werd and Theo-Willem van Leeuwen. Mirjam was specially mentioned as a newcomer on the ranking. Mirjam earned her spot after amassing almost 20 years of experience in the profession and due to her current role as president of the Marques China team. As this ranking is a result of our clients' feedback on our services, we are pleased to share this outcome and want to thank our clients and business relations for their recognition.

“Benelux: Agencies Recommended - Firms
With offices in the Netherlands and Belgium, boutique ABCOR IP is well positioned to assist brand owners with trademark registrations, portfolio management and joined-up strategies across Benelux and the wider continent. Domestic and international players appreciate its creative, outside-the-box thinking and in-house insight, which inform their legal and commercial advice. Founder and managing partner Theo-Willem van Leeuwen truly understands clients’ needs and business goals and how to best achieve them. As president of the Benelux Association of Trademark and Design Attorneys, he is up to date on the latest developments and can effortlessly assist international brands with complex and challenging issues. WTR 1000 newcomer Mirjam de Werd shares van Leeuwen’s global perspective as chair of the European trademark association MARQUES’ China team. She draws on nearly two decades of industry knowledge to advise multinationals and educate the next generation of attorneys.”

other-general

Latest news
NFT: trademark registrations in the metaverse
Volkswagen trumps cult camper
Adidas: bare breasts and sports bras
Yoko Ono and John Lemon gin
Barbie tackles copycat
Our Clients
Follow Abcor
claimant
defendant
claimant
defendant

IP quiz Trademarks

Puma is one of the bigger sports and lifestyle brands in the world. The core-business is the design, development and sale of (sports) shoes, (sports) clothing and accessories. In 1960, Puma registered an international trademark for a device designed in 1958: the formstrip. Since then, Puma has registered approximately 90 formstrip trademarks with validity in the Benelux or the European Union. Puma claims that this is a serial mark. Monshoe is a wholesaler of women's shoes and related products. The company designs and develops Monshoe shoes which it largely markets itself. Monshoe sells its women's shoes under the brands Shoecolate and Pearlz. The shoe Shoecolate is offered in various colour combinations. Puma claims that Monshoe infringes its well-known formstrip trademark. Monshoe contradicts this and states that the average consumer will not perceive the device of Monshoe on the sneakers as a trademark. And if the public will recognize a trademark in the decoration, it will not make the connection to Puma. According to Monshoe, the formstrip logo is not a well-known trademark within the meaning of the BVIE and the UMVo. There is no likelihood of confusion because the sign does not or hardly evoke any association with Puma among the public. In light of the above, who is right? Does this constitute decorative use or linking to a well-known trademark?